- Research
Title
Balanced scorecard model for Paulinian educational institutions. - Researcher
& Institutional Affiliation
Sr. Evangeline Lorenzo Anastacio, St. Paul University Manila (Philippines). - Research
Objectives
- Build
a mission-centered strategic management system for Paulinian schools using
the Balanced Scorecard (BSC).
- Identify
stakeholder-validated perspectives, strategic objectives, and key
performance indicators (KPIs) for Catholic (Paulinian) schools.
- Research
Methodology
- Design:
Modified Delphi (iterative, consensus-seeking, qualitative +
quantitative).
- Participants
(3 stakeholder groups representing 39 schools across the Philippines):
• Delphi experts (school leaders, long-serving faculty, students, alumni, parents) – Round 1 open-ended (117 responses; coded with Weft QDA), Round 2 checklist (110 responses).
• 2012 SPC Educators’ Congress delegates (234) – used same Round-2 checklist for agreement comparison.
• Executive Committee (provincial assistant for education + presidents of 7 St. Paul University System schools) – prioritized strategic objectives and KPIs.
- Findings
& Recommendations
Key Finding—BSC tailored for Catholic schools with five perspectives (unique inclusion: Spirituality):
- Spirituality:
Deepen faith; evangelization involvement; robust religious education;
effective spiritual formation. KPIs include integration of spirituality,
involvement in evangelization, and effectiveness of formation programs.
- Internal
Process (Teaching–Research–Community): Values integration, academic
performance (e.g., licensure exam results), accreditation levels, research
and community engagement breadth.
- Learners
& External Community: Value-added programs, stakeholder
satisfaction/loyalty, enrollment growth, advocacy (environment, peace,
citizenship), and strategic partnerships.
- Learning
Organization (People & Culture): Competence and qualifications,
performance management, rewards, relationships, awareness of
vision–mission–values, witness/volunteerism.
- Fiscal
Resources (Stewardship & Sustainability): Viability, alternative
revenues, standardized financial management, cost-reduction policies,
ethical governance, scholarships.
Recommendations from the study:
- Adapt
the framework locally; engage stakeholders directly in KPI design;
disseminate BSC widely for implementation.
- Use
qualitative indicators for spirituality and other outcomes that resist
purely quantitative measurement; align cultural, structural, and
leadership subsystems with the core values.
- Key
Insights and Implications
- Spirituality
is not a “separate pillar” but permeates all perspectives (individual,
structural, political, cultural subsystems of the school).
- Success
for Catholic schools requires excellence in core academic processes,
continual innovation, people development, and prudent resource
stewardship—animated by a lived spirituality.
- The
Delphi approach is practical for multi-school systems to reach consensus
on strategy and measurement.
- Actionable
Recommendations (for school leaders)
- Convene
a representative stakeholder panel to validate or tailor the
five-perspective BSC and its KPIs for your school.
- Map
existing initiatives to the five perspectives; identify KPI baselines
(e.g., accreditation status, licensure pass rates, stakeholder
satisfaction, faculty qualification mix, revenue diversification).
- Add
explicit “spirituality integration” indicators to curricula, policies,
leadership practices, and culture-building activities.
- Institute
a standardized financial management system and cost-reduction policies;
earmark access programs (scholarships/discounts).
- Establish
annual strategy reviews and public scorecards to reinforce transparency
and learning.
- Summary
Using a modified Delphi process across 39 Catholic schools, the study produced a mission-aligned BSC with five perspectives—Spirituality, Internal Process, Learners & External Community, Learning Organization, and Fiscal Resources—each with stakeholder-endorsed objectives and KPIs. It argues that spirituality is the heart of Catholic schooling and should infuse every perspective, and it offers practical guidance for adopting and measuring this integrated approach to sustain quality, relevance, formation, and viability. - References
for this Research (select)
- Anastacio,
E. L. (2016). Balanced scorecard model for Paulinian educational
institutions. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1),
69–89. (Open access, CC BY-NC-ND).
- Kaplan,
R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that
drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
- Kaplan,
R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating
Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.
- Senge,
P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the
Learning Organization. Currency/Doubleday.
- Hoy,
W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational Administration: Theory,
Research, and Practice. McGraw-Hill
No comments:
Post a Comment